39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen

May 08, 2019 00:20:23
39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen
B2B Revenue Acceleration
39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen

May 08 2019 | 00:20:23

/

Show Notes

Are you attempting to sell a technical product to a non-technical crowd? If so, we’d love to introduce you to Joel Passen, Head of Global Sales at Beamery.

His company sells HR and talent acquisition products, or what they call a “recruiting CRM and marketing software.” But not all their buyers have an extensive technical background.

So, Joel’s uncovered firsthand how to sell a highly technical product to a variety of buyers, many of whom are non-technical.

On this episode, he gives us 3 ways we can sell our products to non-technical buyers.

View Full Transcript

Episode Transcript

WEBVTT 1 00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:07.549 You were listening to be tob revenue acceleration, a podcast dedicated to helping software 2 00:00:07.589 --> 00:00:11.789 executives stay on the cutting edge of sales and marketing in their industry. Let's 3 00:00:11.789 --> 00:00:18.230 get into the show. Welcome to be tob revenue acceleration. My name is 4 00:00:18.230 --> 00:00:22.219 Dane Seebrook, and how I'm here today with Joe Passon, head of global 5 00:00:22.300 --> 00:00:26.339 sales at Bremery Joel Hi. How are you? I'm aready. It's great 6 00:00:26.339 --> 00:00:28.579 to be here. Yes, very good. Thank you, very good in 7 00:00:28.699 --> 00:00:31.859 date. Thanks for taking a time to join us today. A pleasure. 8 00:00:32.259 --> 00:00:37.170 So, Joe, the top eight for today's episode is selling high tech solutions 9 00:00:37.329 --> 00:00:41.409 to a non technology audience. But before we go into the conversation, it 10 00:00:41.490 --> 00:00:44.929 would be really good if you could give us a bit of a background on 11 00:00:45.009 --> 00:00:48.490 yourself, your company and, I guess, the the space that you're sitting 12 00:00:48.490 --> 00:00:51.840 in. Yeah, absolutely, again, I appreciate. Appreciate being here. 13 00:00:51.880 --> 00:00:55.960 I I look after global sales at a company called be Marie and we provide 14 00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:00.000 our customers with talent, crm and marketing solutions. And so, for folks 15 00:01:00.039 --> 00:01:06.109 that aren't in the HR technology or talent technology landscape, you can think of 16 00:01:06.150 --> 00:01:10.030 the product that we offer the market as sort of a combination of both sales 17 00:01:10.069 --> 00:01:15.069 force and Marquetto but for recruiting your talent acquisition, and so just a logistically 18 00:01:15.230 --> 00:01:18.659 you know, obviously we're well, perhaps not obviously we are as Sass company 19 00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:22.739 where venture backed. In know, just completed our series B last year and 20 00:01:23.260 --> 00:01:29.500 has strategic investments from Microsoft's venture capital arm and worked a a large global HCM 21 00:01:29.859 --> 00:01:34.049 provider. And I actually have a global sales for us with offices were headquartered 22 00:01:34.090 --> 00:01:38.849 in London actually, but North America, split between San Francisco and Austin, 23 00:01:38.890 --> 00:01:42.409 and then I have field sellers throughout North America and course sales all reports to 24 00:01:42.489 --> 00:01:46.890 me and also we have a business development team or sales development team that reports 25 00:01:46.930 --> 00:01:49.799 to be as well. Okay, interesting, thanks for that. So Joe 26 00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:53.719 be me Opoly is operating, as you said, within the HR and recruitment 27 00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:57.560 technology space which, from our perspective and from what we've seen across our client 28 00:01:57.599 --> 00:02:01.150 base, seems to be going through a massive disruption and invasion with the advance 29 00:02:01.349 --> 00:02:06.230 of that favorite buzz word at the moment, which is machine learning and ai 30 00:02:06.469 --> 00:02:09.030 and and you know, analytics at that, providing in the automation at providing. 31 00:02:09.189 --> 00:02:14.110 It seems to be growing massively year on year and and really disrupting many 32 00:02:14.150 --> 00:02:19.020 industries. But of course recruitment and the HR piece around automation seemed to be 33 00:02:19.300 --> 00:02:22.740 seeing seen in a particularly big way. Could you give us a from your 34 00:02:22.860 --> 00:02:27.580 perspective, a bit of an overview or an opinion of the current state of 35 00:02:27.699 --> 00:02:31.889 the HR and recruitment technology world and how you see that evolving? And when 36 00:02:31.930 --> 00:02:35.889 I say when, how I see that evolving, is whether you see there's 37 00:02:35.889 --> 00:02:42.009 a place for the future where by actually HR and recruitment technology could replace people 38 00:02:42.009 --> 00:02:45.280 all together. It should be good to get all your thoughts because obviously that's 39 00:02:45.280 --> 00:02:47.639 a much debated topic at the moment. Yeah, absolutely so. Thank you. 40 00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:51.879 There's all there's a lot to unpack with what you just ask, but 41 00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:54.800 you're right in what you're you're seeing. Ivo Is lie and you folks are 42 00:02:54.879 --> 00:02:59.949 a good parameter of the market. There's been about five billion dollars of investment 43 00:03:00.229 --> 00:03:05.629 that's been made in the HR text and talent acquisition sector, and so it's 44 00:03:05.629 --> 00:03:08.229 actually quite noisy and I think there's a reason for that. And frankly, 45 00:03:08.270 --> 00:03:12.189 if the kind of use a bit of an anecdote, you think about the 46 00:03:12.270 --> 00:03:15.580 next time you talk to us CEO, ask her to name the most important 47 00:03:15.699 --> 00:03:19.979 business assets and you're going to get people, you know, talking about their 48 00:03:20.099 --> 00:03:23.500 people first or second every time. So managing and enterprise is number one or 49 00:03:23.539 --> 00:03:28.449 number two asset. Their people is not a bad space to be in and 50 00:03:28.729 --> 00:03:31.969 obviously there's been money flowing into this space. In terms of and I think 51 00:03:32.449 --> 00:03:38.849 again sort of unpacking your question, in terms of trendspotting and the HR text 52 00:03:38.849 --> 00:03:40.680 space, the first thing that we see, and I think the reason for 53 00:03:40.719 --> 00:03:46.120 a lot of this investment, is that innovative employers are really moving away from 54 00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:50.840 a reactive approach to recruiting. So if you think about days of your you 55 00:03:50.960 --> 00:03:53.719 had a job opening, you walked it down to your recruiting department or HR, 56 00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:59.110 they published or posted or advertised a job and you wait to see what 57 00:03:59.349 --> 00:04:01.550 comes in and maybe the recruiter goes through their network and, you know, 58 00:04:01.669 --> 00:04:05.669 gets you some people that perhaps they've had some relationships with, and that's really 59 00:04:05.710 --> 00:04:11.219 a reactive maturity model. And what we're seeing today is that companies are realizing 60 00:04:11.340 --> 00:04:15.460 that transform their labor forces over the next several years and we know that the 61 00:04:15.580 --> 00:04:18.980 service economy, and we'll talk about ai and a second everything's evolving. So 62 00:04:19.100 --> 00:04:23.699 companies really have to be more proactive when they think about talent and go out 63 00:04:24.889 --> 00:04:28.170 and really kind of use, and I think this is really relevant for your 64 00:04:28.209 --> 00:04:31.810 audience, they really have to use sales and marketing techniques. So talent acquisition 65 00:04:32.290 --> 00:04:35.930 is really sort of a sales and marketing game and that means building awareness with 66 00:04:36.009 --> 00:04:39.399 the right people at the right time. So that's one big trend that we 67 00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:43.439 see and obviously Beamri is sort of pointed at that direction. In terms of 68 00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:46.600 again at large, and you talk about machine learning and artificial intelligence. I 69 00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:51.680 believe that this is my personal belief and I think beamery again at large, 70 00:04:51.800 --> 00:05:00.509 shares some of these philosophies or concepts. But artificial intelligence is really noisy right 71 00:05:00.550 --> 00:05:04.470 now and that I think that the trend is not necessarily just to use artificial 72 00:05:04.509 --> 00:05:10.379 intelligence, but I think it actually pivots from this concept of automating a job 73 00:05:10.379 --> 00:05:15.540 role to understanding how we augment jobs and up skill those roles. So, 74 00:05:16.139 --> 00:05:19.660 in short, or in Layman speak, how do we make people more efficient 75 00:05:19.860 --> 00:05:26.610 and better at their jobs rather than replacing their jobs? And then I think 76 00:05:26.610 --> 00:05:29.329 that we're going to see a new generation of analytics out of this too. 77 00:05:29.449 --> 00:05:33.290 So some folks are already calling this telemetry, other folks are calling this augmented 78 00:05:33.370 --> 00:05:38.160 analytics and really, regardless of the name, you're going to see on demand 79 00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:42.879 actionable explanations of what's going on with your workforce. So it's the old instead 80 00:05:42.879 --> 00:05:46.839 of just giving me realport. Okay, insights are nice, but now really 81 00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:50.509 give me actionable insights on demand about how we can make a pivot in real 82 00:05:50.629 --> 00:05:54.709 time. That's a trend. And then the final thing that I think you'll 83 00:05:54.709 --> 00:06:00.990 see is that h are if they have obskilled workers and they have augmented analytics, 84 00:06:01.550 --> 00:06:05.740 then I think we're going to see the HR function and recruiting functions move 85 00:06:05.980 --> 00:06:12.100 from essentially a less judgment driven environment to a more data driven environment, much 86 00:06:12.139 --> 00:06:16.379 like we'd see with finance, sales and marketing, procurement other business functions within 87 00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:19.410 an organization. So I think these you can sort of all meld together. 88 00:06:19.930 --> 00:06:24.129 Yeah, that's an interesting perspective. Thanks for that and I think it's kind 89 00:06:24.129 --> 00:06:26.290 of, I guess, taking a bit of getting used to for a lot 90 00:06:26.329 --> 00:06:29.449 of people out there as well. And to your point, in in functions 91 00:06:29.490 --> 00:06:32.560 like finance and sales and marketing. You know, we're used to now going 92 00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:35.600 on a website and talking to a chat Bot. People met, some people 93 00:06:35.639 --> 00:06:39.079 made dispute, whether they like it or not, but I think that's becoming 94 00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:44.360 more and more of a reality. Actually almost giving HR professionals the ability to 95 00:06:44.439 --> 00:06:46.829 step away a little bit from the day to day mundated and also of sifting 96 00:06:46.910 --> 00:06:51.189 through CV for example, and actually having more data their fingertips is probably something 97 00:06:51.230 --> 00:06:54.990 they is a concept they'll have to get their head around, but in the 98 00:06:55.029 --> 00:06:58.269 future, to your point is should allow them to to do more with less 99 00:06:58.310 --> 00:07:00.310 in some respects, with with the automation. That brings one of the points 100 00:07:00.350 --> 00:07:04.180 that you made that was quite interesting for me is giving the giving organizations, 101 00:07:04.259 --> 00:07:06.819 with your solution in particular, if we talk about that for now, giving 102 00:07:08.220 --> 00:07:14.300 organizations the ability to rather than reactively recruit individuals based on when a job may 103 00:07:14.379 --> 00:07:19.089 come up, to actually proactively always is identifying maybe the passive market that isn't 104 00:07:19.089 --> 00:07:23.769 quite read isn't necessarily looking for what, but they're out there and fin look 105 00:07:23.810 --> 00:07:27.610 at the market that we're we're all in here with, and let's focus for 106 00:07:27.649 --> 00:07:30.839 a second specifically on the bay area. From from what we see, that's 107 00:07:30.839 --> 00:07:34.639 a massive skill shortage in the bay are specific to technology, both from a 108 00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:39.639 sales and marked inspective and from a technical perspective. With something like you're offering, 109 00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.360 how would you help a business with that? Yeah, let me give 110 00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:46.709 you an example, a real world example. We have a client that replaced 111 00:07:46.790 --> 00:07:51.589 essentially blockbuster. I won't name the clients name, but they have very hard 112 00:07:51.629 --> 00:07:58.029 to find creatives, production studio folks. They produce television shows for the most 113 00:07:58.069 --> 00:08:01.939 part on demand and the folks in that industry are in very, very high 114 00:08:01.980 --> 00:08:05.259 demand, and so you can post jobs for them in the reactive model and, 115 00:08:05.339 --> 00:08:09.379 quite frankly, you're not going to get much. You can send recruiters 116 00:08:09.420 --> 00:08:11.579 after him, like we do in Bedr, to send them after prospects. 117 00:08:11.779 --> 00:08:16.970 If you think about recruiting being the analog being the recruiting is very much like 118 00:08:16.089 --> 00:08:20.009 sales. Think about it, and that Lens for the for our listeners. 119 00:08:20.529 --> 00:08:24.009 So we can send recruiters and sorcers after people and we know that that's going 120 00:08:24.009 --> 00:08:28.959 to be moderately effective and we've been doing that for years in recruiting. But 121 00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:33.440 what if I told you that we could, just like in professional be to 122 00:08:33.480 --> 00:08:39.440 be marketing? We could go out and understand prospects behaviors and market to them 123 00:08:39.759 --> 00:08:43.830 and build a community, a long tail community of people that when they are 124 00:08:43.070 --> 00:08:46.789 ready to search for a job or they are, they've you know, they 125 00:08:46.830 --> 00:08:50.470 are thinking about new opportunities outside of wherever they're at, that I could make 126 00:08:50.629 --> 00:08:54.549 you the employer of choice for when they wake up in the morning and decide 127 00:08:54.590 --> 00:08:58.059 that maybe they'll look around. We've been in their ear and their inbox and 128 00:08:58.100 --> 00:09:03.220 their tax messages, in whatever channel that they're getting information, building that awareness 129 00:09:03.259 --> 00:09:07.940 along the way and making it easy for them to join a community. That 130 00:09:07.019 --> 00:09:11.690 adds value, just like we do with content marketing. That adds value. 131 00:09:11.730 --> 00:09:16.769 That brings them into the organization over time. Same thing with campus and getting 132 00:09:16.769 --> 00:09:22.370 people when they're graduating from school. So starting those relationships early with think about 133 00:09:22.370 --> 00:09:26.600 it kind of like consumers, but with candidates and prospects. That's really what 134 00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:28.480 our company is focused on doing. That makes sense? Yeah, that makes 135 00:09:28.519 --> 00:09:33.000 a lot of sense. So, and that kind of segues nicely into the 136 00:09:33.080 --> 00:09:35.879 next point, which is your technology company. I guess you could get really 137 00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:41.389 into in the weight of what your solution is and how it works and the 138 00:09:41.509 --> 00:09:45.230 technical boats and whistles of it. But but ultimately, as we've spoken a 139 00:09:45.230 --> 00:09:48.669 lot about a lot, you are selling to HR functions for the most part, 140 00:09:48.710 --> 00:09:54.580 if I'm not mistaken, and for the most part hl profession was aren't 141 00:09:54.580 --> 00:09:58.179 necessarily coming to come into the workforce with computer science degrees. So they're not 142 00:09:58.220 --> 00:10:01.500 really that technical audience. So how do you, as a technology company, 143 00:10:01.980 --> 00:10:05.659 go about selling to a less technical audience? If what's your process for doing 144 00:10:05.700 --> 00:10:09.889 so in our space? Specifically, and I think this would go in line 145 00:10:09.929 --> 00:10:13.570 with this question, if we were selling into a non technical audience in another 146 00:10:13.690 --> 00:10:16.409 line of business, and there are still a couple of lines of business left 147 00:10:16.450 --> 00:10:22.399 that, as you put it, don't necessarily have an extensive technology background. 148 00:10:22.559 --> 00:10:26.240 And what I tend to do is look for former practitioners. So my best, 149 00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:33.519 most accomplished sellers and the ones that climb the enablement curve, you know, 150 00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.669 the the ramp curve faster than anyone else in our organization are people that 151 00:10:37.990 --> 00:10:41.750 have, number one, been in some sort of recruiting capacity in their life, 152 00:10:41.909 --> 00:10:46.230 and so I think you could extrapolate this back to any industry. Higher 153 00:10:46.269 --> 00:10:48.190 out of that industry of people that perhaps have done that job in some way, 154 00:10:48.230 --> 00:10:52.539 shape or form or been around it and they're going to obviously understand the 155 00:10:52.580 --> 00:10:56.779 challenges of those end users and ultimately buyers better than anyone else. So I 156 00:10:56.899 --> 00:11:01.299 look for people that have been practitioners in the past, maybe early in their 157 00:11:01.379 --> 00:11:05.809 career, and then have become accomplished sellers in the space over time. So 158 00:11:05.889 --> 00:11:09.649 I want my sellers to empathize with the buyers firsthand. I want them to 159 00:11:09.649 --> 00:11:13.970 feel their pain and this also again serves to reduce our ramp times. So 160 00:11:13.090 --> 00:11:18.600 that's that's sort of the number one strategy. Number two is we tend to 161 00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:24.960 shape our sales process less of this sort of prescribed you know, here is 162 00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:28.480 a demo, here's what you have to do next, MR and Mrs Customer. 163 00:11:30.080 --> 00:11:33.389 We actually say hey, this is an education process. So we don't 164 00:11:33.389 --> 00:11:37.110 run a traditional sales process. Our focus is really and helping our champions and 165 00:11:37.230 --> 00:11:41.389 influencers develop a strong, wrong internal business case for how we can benefit the 166 00:11:41.509 --> 00:11:46.070 organization and then taking that and helping them package it to go and sell higher 167 00:11:46.110 --> 00:11:50.460 up a power line, if you will. So we support the process with 168 00:11:50.659 --> 00:11:54.700 content and collateral that's really designed from you know, for a variety of different 169 00:11:54.700 --> 00:11:58.259 stakeholders, including the IT teams and the procurement and finance teams. So that's 170 00:11:58.299 --> 00:12:01.809 the second strategy that we use. And then the third one is we really 171 00:12:01.850 --> 00:12:07.889 let our product tell the narrative and we bring our salespeople, oftentimes on site 172 00:12:07.929 --> 00:12:11.370 with our customers and walk them through these various use cases, setting up our 173 00:12:11.409 --> 00:12:15.450 product along the way to show them how we can take them from being a 174 00:12:15.570 --> 00:12:20.919 reactive talent organization and mature them into being a proactive talent organization along the way. 175 00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:24.559 We create their own narrative within our product and that's been really powerful. 176 00:12:24.919 --> 00:12:28.159 That makes sense. And just on that sort of line of question, I 177 00:12:28.240 --> 00:12:31.950 guess, and you mentioned earlier on in the conversation, that there seems to 178 00:12:31.990 --> 00:12:37.110 being around, you know, five billion dollar investment or they've seen the market, 179 00:12:37.149 --> 00:12:39.669 the HR tech markets worth around five billion dollars. I think the approach 180 00:12:39.710 --> 00:12:43.659 to you've just described with regards to your sales process in particular, where it's 181 00:12:43.659 --> 00:12:50.580 very much an education process, where you're you're engaging in multiple different personas and 182 00:12:50.620 --> 00:12:54.059 you have a value to each of those different personas you touch, how would 183 00:12:54.100 --> 00:12:56.980 you in in a noisy market, what could be seen as a complicated market, 184 00:12:58.100 --> 00:13:03.450 where HL professionals must be absolutely inundated with solutions that, I guess, 185 00:13:03.490 --> 00:13:05.970 could be seen to be offering any similar message to a him, to value 186 00:13:07.049 --> 00:13:09.970 to your solution? How do you how do you differentiate such a noisy, 187 00:13:09.009 --> 00:13:13.399 crowded malcular that? I think there's three things and and let me let me 188 00:13:13.399 --> 00:13:16.679 focus on two of them. But the differentiation process is, I think, 189 00:13:18.080 --> 00:13:22.840 especially in this as companies, product driven. So for us, and I 190 00:13:22.919 --> 00:13:26.629 have to speak to this specifically in our industry, which is talent crm and 191 00:13:26.990 --> 00:13:31.710 talent marketing, you know, it's a it's a product that sits on top 192 00:13:31.750 --> 00:13:35.750 of essentially, if you think about a sales funnel, we are the very 193 00:13:35.909 --> 00:13:41.419 top of the funnel, getting our customers more prospects to market to to ultimately 194 00:13:41.539 --> 00:13:46.740 convert them into candidates. So that's the framework that we use. We have 195 00:13:46.899 --> 00:13:54.259 to have a meaningful, unique and differentiated solution to cut through the noise and 196 00:13:54.500 --> 00:14:01.490 that needs to meet the markets needs and really be prescriptive to this proactive process 197 00:14:01.490 --> 00:14:03.450 that we create for people. So instead of using big words, we have 198 00:14:03.529 --> 00:14:07.370 to have an innovative product and that's that's part of winning SASS game. Is, 199 00:14:07.490 --> 00:14:11.279 I think, to fold number one, you have to have an innovative 200 00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:13.840 product that does cut through the noises you just suggest in number two. You 201 00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:20.240 have to operationalize how you distribute that product and out operationalize your competitors, and 202 00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:24.789 that's something that we continue to build at beamery as a good market strategy. 203 00:14:24.950 --> 00:14:30.629 So have a better product and be more operationally sound and than your peers, 204 00:14:30.669 --> 00:14:33.669 and that's a winning solution in any market. It's specifically in a noisy one 205 00:14:33.789 --> 00:14:39.659 like tea technology that makes sense and I think as well that's is it? 206 00:14:39.179 --> 00:14:43.340 What you just described around having a yes, a great product, but the 207 00:14:43.419 --> 00:14:46.940 second piece around being more operationally effective is even more relevant to you as a 208 00:14:48.019 --> 00:14:50.059 business because it's a bit of an interesting background in that, you know, 209 00:14:50.299 --> 00:14:54.210 a US software company coming out of sale of combatty. You're actually a British 210 00:14:54.250 --> 00:14:58.649 company that is gone the other way and actually entered North America. So and 211 00:14:58.850 --> 00:15:01.570 honest, slightly different tactually as as a UK founding business. What would a 212 00:15:03.289 --> 00:15:07.639 challenges that you faced when expanded to North America and have you seen any differences 213 00:15:07.879 --> 00:15:13.120 between the sale process and how you go about selling in North America versus what 214 00:15:13.240 --> 00:15:16.759 you really started as a business in a meal? Yeah, that's IT'S A 215 00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:22.149 it's a great question. And frankly, breaking the US market in our business 216 00:15:22.549 --> 00:15:28.029 wasn't the biggest challenge. We found that large US based employers in our target 217 00:15:28.110 --> 00:15:33.470 market, North American employer for that matter, generally more progressive from a recruiting 218 00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:37.379 standpoint. In as you point out from your own experiences in the in the 219 00:15:37.460 --> 00:15:41.139 bay area, there's a big supply demand problem. So essentially we're selling a 220 00:15:41.259 --> 00:15:46.299 product that people need in a variety of theaters. Because we're addressing, and 221 00:15:46.419 --> 00:15:48.820 this was at the top of the podcast, one of the things that's really 222 00:15:48.860 --> 00:15:54.129 exciting about our space is there there literally is a supply and demand problem. 223 00:15:54.250 --> 00:15:58.409 We're not creating more stem graduates necessarily at the rate that the market needs them. 224 00:15:58.690 --> 00:16:03.570 So breaking into a market and having people being interested in the things that 225 00:16:03.690 --> 00:16:07.720 we're saying wasn't necessarily our issue. I think that the founders of beam re 226 00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:12.039 prior to my joining about six months ago, what they learned was that the 227 00:16:12.200 --> 00:16:18.429 procurement process and sort of the ways of doing businesses, the nuances might be 228 00:16:19.110 --> 00:16:26.549 a bit different than perhaps starting in the UK and Continental Europe for that for 229 00:16:26.629 --> 00:16:29.870 that matter. So are you at? I'll give you an example of I'll 230 00:16:29.909 --> 00:16:33.220 give you actually two examples of this or maybe the differences to the second part 231 00:16:33.220 --> 00:16:37.100 of your question are Amia prospects and customers tend to have a more, I'd 232 00:16:37.100 --> 00:16:42.139 say, formal evaluation process. They're more organized, there's more of a consensus 233 00:16:42.340 --> 00:16:45.940 building, a formality around the consensus building. So, for example, in 234 00:16:47.059 --> 00:16:52.210 that we see more steering committees, more formal RFP's, more request for tenders, 235 00:16:52.809 --> 00:16:56.570 things that are more of this sort of formalized, step based process to 236 00:16:56.610 --> 00:17:00.090 get through procurement. The communications are more formal, the meetings are more formal. 237 00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:07.119 Finance it and procurement are more out in front earlier, in our our 238 00:17:07.240 --> 00:17:12.240 perspective, evaluation processes outside of North America, and I attribute that to there's 239 00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:17.710 a cultural difference. On the flip side, in North America we see more 240 00:17:17.789 --> 00:17:25.630 at hoc processes. We see less executive buying earlier in the early stages of 241 00:17:25.710 --> 00:17:29.589 a project until we get maybe through the middle of the project where we have 242 00:17:29.750 --> 00:17:33.099 to, as I mentioned before, take our folks that are lower on the 243 00:17:33.180 --> 00:17:38.299 power line, our champions and influencers, and build them into people that are 244 00:17:38.420 --> 00:17:45.490 ultimately developing our value proposition, to get experienced or more senior DM's decision makers 245 00:17:45.809 --> 00:17:49.450 involved, so our observation, in short, is that US companies are more 246 00:17:49.490 --> 00:17:53.609 comfortable with buying technology in general, but the processes are looser, they're more 247 00:17:53.690 --> 00:18:00.000 informal. We have to actually put more inertia into the meetings to get into 248 00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:04.200 the decision makers lexicon of decisionmaking, and that's been the biggest sort of eye 249 00:18:04.240 --> 00:18:07.680 opening thing for us. And then there's some little differences and how we communicate 250 00:18:08.119 --> 00:18:12.589 sort of tactical things that you'll see absolutely and I think to your point around 251 00:18:12.589 --> 00:18:15.869 the tactical difference, it's that that just comes down to a coach with Ain, 252 00:18:17.069 --> 00:18:21.630 I mean we see uk us slightly more cynical markets, if you like, 253 00:18:21.829 --> 00:18:25.509 whereas if you go into Spain or front or Italy you must need to 254 00:18:25.549 --> 00:18:30.619 start wanting and dining prospect so it's that can be completely different in side processes 255 00:18:30.779 --> 00:18:33.779 are entertainment budget. You know, when we look at just line item budgets 256 00:18:33.819 --> 00:18:38.299 for travel and entertainment and you look at the region in the world that accumulates 257 00:18:38.700 --> 00:18:42.289 proportionally anyway, the most spend, it's the nordics. I don't know why, 258 00:18:42.650 --> 00:18:47.369 maybe it's cultural, but I've seen it trend for four quarters now. 259 00:18:47.970 --> 00:18:51.009 Is Interesting. I've no I was expecting to say Italy, O, Spain 260 00:18:51.089 --> 00:18:55.759 or something, so that that's very true. So, Joe, the the 261 00:18:55.839 --> 00:18:59.759 insights have been really and intriguing. So I really appreciate that you've taken the 262 00:18:59.839 --> 00:19:02.960 time to share your thoughts with the audience today. Yes, the last point 263 00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:06.440 is, if anyone wants to connect with you to learn more about beamery or 264 00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:08.920 continue this conversation offline, what would be the best way to get in touch 265 00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:12.230 with you and the and the business? Absolutely, I'm easy to find, 266 00:19:12.269 --> 00:19:17.109 so I'm on Linkedin. It's Joel passing, and then my email address is 267 00:19:17.150 --> 00:19:21.109 very simple. It's Joel at BEA MARIECOM and I have to put a plug 268 00:19:21.230 --> 00:19:25.660 in and tell you that we're always looking for a talented sales folks and talented 269 00:19:25.660 --> 00:19:29.859 marketing people, both in the United States and in London. So I appreciate 270 00:19:29.900 --> 00:19:33.500 your time and I appreciate you having me. Thanks a lot once again, 271 00:19:33.539 --> 00:19:36.180 Joe. was great having you on the show. And then we appreciate so 272 00:19:36.539 --> 00:19:44.250 very good. operatics has redefined the meaning of revenue generation for technology companies worldwide. 273 00:19:44.289 --> 00:19:48.970 While the traditional concepts of building and managing inside sales teams inhouse has existed 274 00:19:49.089 --> 00:19:53.400 for many years, companies are struggling with a lack of focus, agility and 275 00:19:53.640 --> 00:20:00.119 scale required in today's fast and complex world of enterprise technology sales. See How 276 00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:07.869 operatics can help your company accelerate pipeline at operatics dotnet. You've been listening to 277 00:20:07.990 --> 00:20:11.869 be tob revenue acceleration. To ensure that you never miss an episode, subscribe 278 00:20:11.869 --> 00:20:15.430 to the show in your favorite podcast player. Thank you so much for listening. 279 00:20:15.470 --> 00:20:17.630 Until next time,

Other Episodes

Episode

August 21, 2019 00:16:26
Episode Cover

54: What an Agile Sales Team Looks Like at IBM w/ Ewing Gillaspy

An agile sales team is really, uh, agile. But there’s got to be more to it than that.What’s the secret sauce that allows reps...

Listen

Episode

January 01, 2020 00:26:36
Episode Cover

67: What Exactly Does a Product Marketer Do? w/ Suda Srinivasan

If you’ve been in tech long, you know about product marketers. But here’s the question: What do product marketers actually do?  That’s the question...

Listen

Episode

September 25, 2019 00:25:52
Episode Cover

59: Marketing an Open Source Company w/ Freek Hemminga

“Open source” means more than just the software. It’s more of a business model, mindset, and culture — especially when it comes to growing...

Listen