39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen

May 08, 2019 00:20:23
39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen
B2B Revenue Acceleration
39: Selling High Tech Solutions to Non-Tech Buyers w/ Joel Passen

May 08 2019 | 00:20:23

/

Show Notes

Are you attempting to sell a technical product to a non-technical crowd? If so, we’d love to introduce you to Joel Passen, Head of Global Sales at Beamery.

His company sells HR and talent acquisition products, or what they call a “recruiting CRM and marketing software.” But not all their buyers have an extensive technical background.

So, Joel’s uncovered firsthand how to sell a highly technical product to a variety of buyers, many of whom are non-technical.

On this episode, he gives us 3 ways we can sell our products to non-technical buyers.

View Full Transcript

Episode Transcript

WEBVTT 1 00:00:02.520 --> 00:00:07.549 You were listening to be tob revenue acceleration, a podcast dedicated to helping software 2 00:00:07.589 --> 00:00:11.789 executives stay on the cutting edge of sales and marketing in their industry. Let's 3 00:00:11.789 --> 00:00:18.230 get into the show. Welcome to be tob revenue acceleration. My name is 4 00:00:18.230 --> 00:00:22.219 Dane Seebrook, and how I'm here today with Joe Passon, head of global 5 00:00:22.300 --> 00:00:26.339 sales at Bremery Joel Hi. How are you? I'm aready. It's great 6 00:00:26.339 --> 00:00:28.579 to be here. Yes, very good. Thank you, very good in 7 00:00:28.699 --> 00:00:31.859 date. Thanks for taking a time to join us today. A pleasure. 8 00:00:32.259 --> 00:00:37.170 So, Joe, the top eight for today's episode is selling high tech solutions 9 00:00:37.329 --> 00:00:41.409 to a non technology audience. But before we go into the conversation, it 10 00:00:41.490 --> 00:00:44.929 would be really good if you could give us a bit of a background on 11 00:00:45.009 --> 00:00:48.490 yourself, your company and, I guess, the the space that you're sitting 12 00:00:48.490 --> 00:00:51.840 in. Yeah, absolutely, again, I appreciate. Appreciate being here. 13 00:00:51.880 --> 00:00:55.960 I I look after global sales at a company called be Marie and we provide 14 00:00:56.000 --> 00:01:00.000 our customers with talent, crm and marketing solutions. And so, for folks 15 00:01:00.039 --> 00:01:06.109 that aren't in the HR technology or talent technology landscape, you can think of 16 00:01:06.150 --> 00:01:10.030 the product that we offer the market as sort of a combination of both sales 17 00:01:10.069 --> 00:01:15.069 force and Marquetto but for recruiting your talent acquisition, and so just a logistically 18 00:01:15.230 --> 00:01:18.659 you know, obviously we're well, perhaps not obviously we are as Sass company 19 00:01:18.900 --> 00:01:22.739 where venture backed. In know, just completed our series B last year and 20 00:01:23.260 --> 00:01:29.500 has strategic investments from Microsoft's venture capital arm and worked a a large global HCM 21 00:01:29.859 --> 00:01:34.049 provider. And I actually have a global sales for us with offices were headquartered 22 00:01:34.090 --> 00:01:38.849 in London actually, but North America, split between San Francisco and Austin, 23 00:01:38.890 --> 00:01:42.409 and then I have field sellers throughout North America and course sales all reports to 24 00:01:42.489 --> 00:01:46.890 me and also we have a business development team or sales development team that reports 25 00:01:46.930 --> 00:01:49.799 to be as well. Okay, interesting, thanks for that. So Joe 26 00:01:49.079 --> 00:01:53.719 be me Opoly is operating, as you said, within the HR and recruitment 27 00:01:53.760 --> 00:01:57.560 technology space which, from our perspective and from what we've seen across our client 28 00:01:57.599 --> 00:02:01.150 base, seems to be going through a massive disruption and invasion with the advance 29 00:02:01.349 --> 00:02:06.230 of that favorite buzz word at the moment, which is machine learning and ai 30 00:02:06.469 --> 00:02:09.030 and and you know, analytics at that, providing in the automation at providing. 31 00:02:09.189 --> 00:02:14.110 It seems to be growing massively year on year and and really disrupting many 32 00:02:14.150 --> 00:02:19.020 industries. But of course recruitment and the HR piece around automation seemed to be 33 00:02:19.300 --> 00:02:22.740 seeing seen in a particularly big way. Could you give us a from your 34 00:02:22.860 --> 00:02:27.580 perspective, a bit of an overview or an opinion of the current state of 35 00:02:27.699 --> 00:02:31.889 the HR and recruitment technology world and how you see that evolving? And when 36 00:02:31.930 --> 00:02:35.889 I say when, how I see that evolving, is whether you see there's 37 00:02:35.889 --> 00:02:42.009 a place for the future where by actually HR and recruitment technology could replace people 38 00:02:42.009 --> 00:02:45.280 all together. It should be good to get all your thoughts because obviously that's 39 00:02:45.280 --> 00:02:47.639 a much debated topic at the moment. Yeah, absolutely so. Thank you. 40 00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:51.879 There's all there's a lot to unpack with what you just ask, but 41 00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:54.800 you're right in what you're you're seeing. Ivo Is lie and you folks are 42 00:02:54.879 --> 00:02:59.949 a good parameter of the market. There's been about five billion dollars of investment 43 00:03:00.229 --> 00:03:05.629 that's been made in the HR text and talent acquisition sector, and so it's 44 00:03:05.629 --> 00:03:08.229 actually quite noisy and I think there's a reason for that. And frankly, 45 00:03:08.270 --> 00:03:12.189 if the kind of use a bit of an anecdote, you think about the 46 00:03:12.270 --> 00:03:15.580 next time you talk to us CEO, ask her to name the most important 47 00:03:15.699 --> 00:03:19.979 business assets and you're going to get people, you know, talking about their 48 00:03:20.099 --> 00:03:23.500 people first or second every time. So managing and enterprise is number one or 49 00:03:23.539 --> 00:03:28.449 number two asset. Their people is not a bad space to be in and 50 00:03:28.729 --> 00:03:31.969 obviously there's been money flowing into this space. In terms of and I think 51 00:03:32.449 --> 00:03:38.849 again sort of unpacking your question, in terms of trendspotting and the HR text 52 00:03:38.849 --> 00:03:40.680 space, the first thing that we see, and I think the reason for 53 00:03:40.719 --> 00:03:46.120 a lot of this investment, is that innovative employers are really moving away from 54 00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:50.840 a reactive approach to recruiting. So if you think about days of your you 55 00:03:50.960 --> 00:03:53.719 had a job opening, you walked it down to your recruiting department or HR, 56 00:03:54.000 --> 00:03:59.110 they published or posted or advertised a job and you wait to see what 57 00:03:59.349 --> 00:04:01.550 comes in and maybe the recruiter goes through their network and, you know, 58 00:04:01.669 --> 00:04:05.669 gets you some people that perhaps they've had some relationships with, and that's really 59 00:04:05.710 --> 00:04:11.219 a reactive maturity model. And what we're seeing today is that companies are realizing 60 00:04:11.340 --> 00:04:15.460 that transform their labor forces over the next several years and we know that the 61 00:04:15.580 --> 00:04:18.980 service economy, and we'll talk about ai and a second everything's evolving. So 62 00:04:19.100 --> 00:04:23.699 companies really have to be more proactive when they think about talent and go out 63 00:04:24.889 --> 00:04:28.170 and really kind of use, and I think this is really relevant for your 64 00:04:28.209 --> 00:04:31.810 audience, they really have to use sales and marketing techniques. So talent acquisition 65 00:04:32.290 --> 00:04:35.930 is really sort of a sales and marketing game and that means building awareness with 66 00:04:36.009 --> 00:04:39.399 the right people at the right time. So that's one big trend that we 67 00:04:39.480 --> 00:04:43.439 see and obviously Beamri is sort of pointed at that direction. In terms of 68 00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:46.600 again at large, and you talk about machine learning and artificial intelligence. I 69 00:04:46.759 --> 00:04:51.680 believe that this is my personal belief and I think beamery again at large, 70 00:04:51.800 --> 00:05:00.509 shares some of these philosophies or concepts. But artificial intelligence is really noisy right 71 00:05:00.550 --> 00:05:04.470 now and that I think that the trend is not necessarily just to use artificial 72 00:05:04.509 --> 00:05:10.379 intelligence, but I think it actually pivots from this concept of automating a job 73 00:05:10.379 --> 00:05:15.540 role to understanding how we augment jobs and up skill those roles. So, 74 00:05:16.139 --> 00:05:19.660 in short, or in Layman speak, how do we make people more efficient 75 00:05:19.860 --> 00:05:26.610 and better at their jobs rather than replacing their jobs? And then I think 76 00:05:26.610 --> 00:05:29.329 that we're going to see a new generation of analytics out of this too. 77 00:05:29.449 --> 00:05:33.290 So some folks are already calling this telemetry, other folks are calling this augmented 78 00:05:33.370 --> 00:05:38.160 analytics and really, regardless of the name, you're going to see on demand 79 00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:42.879 actionable explanations of what's going on with your workforce. So it's the old instead 80 00:05:42.879 --> 00:05:46.839 of just giving me realport. Okay, insights are nice, but now really 81 00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:50.509 give me actionable insights on demand about how we can make a pivot in real 82 00:05:50.629 --> 00:05:54.709 time. That's a trend. And then the final thing that I think you'll 83 00:05:54.709 --> 00:06:00.990 see is that h are if they have obskilled workers and they have augmented analytics, 84 00:06:01.550 --> 00:06:05.740 then I think we're going to see the HR function and recruiting functions move 85 00:06:05.980 --> 00:06:12.100 from essentially a less judgment driven environment to a more data driven environment, much 86 00:06:12.139 --> 00:06:16.379 like we'd see with finance, sales and marketing, procurement other business functions within 87 00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:19.410 an organization. So I think these you can sort of all meld together. 88 00:06:19.930 --> 00:06:24.129 Yeah, that's an interesting perspective. Thanks for that and I think it's kind 89 00:06:24.129 --> 00:06:26.290 of, I guess, taking a bit of getting used to for a lot 90 00:06:26.329 --> 00:06:29.449 of people out there as well. And to your point, in in functions 91 00:06:29.490 --> 00:06:32.560 like finance and sales and marketing. You know, we're used to now going 92 00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:35.600 on a website and talking to a chat Bot. People met, some people 93 00:06:35.639 --> 00:06:39.079 made dispute, whether they like it or not, but I think that's becoming 94 00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:44.360 more and more of a reality. Actually almost giving HR professionals the ability to 95 00:06:44.439 --> 00:06:46.829 step away a little bit from the day to day mundated and also of sifting 96 00:06:46.910 --> 00:06:51.189 through CV for example, and actually having more data their fingertips is probably something 97 00:06:51.230 --> 00:06:54.990 they is a concept they'll have to get their head around, but in the 98 00:06:55.029 --> 00:06:58.269 future, to your point is should allow them to to do more with less 99 00:06:58.310 --> 00:07:00.310 in some respects, with with the automation. That brings one of the points 100 00:07:00.350 --> 00:07:04.180 that you made that was quite interesting for me is giving the giving organizations, 101 00:07:04.259 --> 00:07:06.819 with your solution in particular, if we talk about that for now, giving 102 00:07:08.220 --> 00:07:14.300 organizations the ability to rather than reactively recruit individuals based on when a job may 103 00:07:14.379 --> 00:07:19.089 come up, to actually proactively always is identifying maybe the passive market that isn't 104 00:07:19.089 --> 00:07:23.769 quite read isn't necessarily looking for what, but they're out there and fin look 105 00:07:23.810 --> 00:07:27.610 at the market that we're we're all in here with, and let's focus for 106 00:07:27.649 --> 00:07:30.839 a second specifically on the bay area. From from what we see, that's 107 00:07:30.839 --> 00:07:34.639 a massive skill shortage in the bay are specific to technology, both from a 108 00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:39.639 sales and marked inspective and from a technical perspective. With something like you're offering, 109 00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.360 how would you help a business with that? Yeah, let me give 110 00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:46.709 you an example, a real world example. We have a client that replaced 111 00:07:46.790 --> 00:07:51.589 essentially blockbuster. I won't name the clients name, but they have very hard 112 00:07:51.629 --> 00:07:58.029 to find creatives, production studio folks. They produce television shows for the most 113 00:07:58.069 --> 00:08:01.939 part on demand and the folks in that industry are in very, very high 114 00:08:01.980 --> 00:08:05.259 demand, and so you can post jobs for them in the reactive model and, 115 00:08:05.339 --> 00:08:09.379 quite frankly, you're not going to get much. You can send recruiters 116 00:08:09.420 --> 00:08:11.579 after him, like we do in Bedr, to send them after prospects. 117 00:08:11.779 --> 00:08:16.970 If you think about recruiting being the analog being the recruiting is very much like 118 00:08:16.089 --> 00:08:20.009 sales. Think about it, and that Lens for the for our listeners. 119 00:08:20.529 --> 00:08:24.009 So we can send recruiters and sorcers after people and we know that that's going 120 00:08:24.009 --> 00:08:28.959 to be moderately effective and we've been doing that for years in recruiting. But 121 00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:33.440 what if I told you that we could, just like in professional be to 122 00:08:33.480 --> 00:08:39.440 be marketing? We could go out and understand prospects behaviors and market to them 123 00:08:39.759 --> 00:08:43.830 and build a community, a long tail community of people that when they are 124 00:08:43.070 --> 00:08:46.789 ready to search for a job or they are, they've you know, they 125 00:08:46.830 --> 00:08:50.470 are thinking about new opportunities outside of wherever they're at, that I could make 126 00:08:50.629 --> 00:08:54.549 you the employer of choice for when they wake up in the morning and decide 127 00:08:54.590 --> 00:08:58.059 that maybe they'll look around. We've been in their ear and their inbox and 128 00:08:58.100 --> 00:09:03.220 their tax messages, in whatever channel that they're getting information, building that awareness 129 00:09:03.259 --> 00:09:07.940 along the way and making it easy for them to join a community. That 130 00:09:07.019 --> 00:09:11.690 adds value, just like we do with content marketing. That adds value. 131 00:09:11.730 --> 00:09:16.769 That brings them into the organization over time. Same thing with campus and getting 132 00:09:16.769 --> 00:09:22.370 people when they're graduating from school. So starting those relationships early with think about 133 00:09:22.370 --> 00:09:26.600 it kind of like consumers, but with candidates and prospects. That's really what 134 00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:28.480 our company is focused on doing. That makes sense? Yeah, that makes 135 00:09:28.519 --> 00:09:33.000 a lot of sense. So, and that kind of segues nicely into the 136 00:09:33.080 --> 00:09:35.879 next point, which is your technology company. I guess you could get really 137 00:09:35.919 --> 00:09:41.389 into in the weight of what your solution is and how it works and the 138 00:09:41.509 --> 00:09:45.230 technical boats and whistles of it. But but ultimately, as we've spoken a 139 00:09:45.230 --> 00:09:48.669 lot about a lot, you are selling to HR functions for the most part, 140 00:09:48.710 --> 00:09:54.580 if I'm not mistaken, and for the most part hl profession was aren't 141 00:09:54.580 --> 00:09:58.179 necessarily coming to come into the workforce with computer science degrees. So they're not 142 00:09:58.220 --> 00:10:01.500 really that technical audience. So how do you, as a technology company, 143 00:10:01.980 --> 00:10:05.659 go about selling to a less technical audience? If what's your process for doing 144 00:10:05.700 --> 00:10:09.889 so in our space? Specifically, and I think this would go in line 145 00:10:09.929 --> 00:10:13.570 with this question, if we were selling into a non technical audience in another 146 00:10:13.690 --> 00:10:16.409 line of business, and there are still a couple of lines of business left 147 00:10:16.450 --> 00:10:22.399 that, as you put it, don't necessarily have an extensive technology background. 148 00:10:22.559 --> 00:10:26.240 And what I tend to do is look for former practitioners. So my best, 149 00:10:26.840 --> 00:10:33.519 most accomplished sellers and the ones that climb the enablement curve, you know, 150 00:10:33.639 --> 00:10:37.669 the the ramp curve faster than anyone else in our organization are people that 151 00:10:37.990 --> 00:10:41.750 have, number one, been in some sort of recruiting capacity in their life, 152 00:10:41.909 --> 00:10:46.230 and so I think you could extrapolate this back to any industry. Higher 153 00:10:46.269 --> 00:10:48.190 out of that industry of people that perhaps have done that job in some way, 154 00:10:48.230 --> 00:10:52.539 shape or form or been around it and they're going to obviously understand the 155 00:10:52.580 --> 00:10:56.779 challenges of those end users and ultimately buyers better than anyone else. So I 156 00:10:56.899 --> 00:11:01.299 look for people that have been practitioners in the past, maybe early in their 157 00:11:01.379 --> 00:11:05.809 career, and then have become accomplished sellers in the space over time. So 158 00:11:05.889 --> 00:11:09.649 I want my sellers to empathize with the buyers firsthand. I want them to 159 00:11:09.649 --> 00:11:13.970 feel their pain and this also again serves to reduce our ramp times. So 160 00:11:13.090 --> 00:11:18.600 that's that's sort of the number one strategy. Number two is we tend to 161 00:11:18.840 --> 00:11:24.960 shape our sales process less of this sort of prescribed you know, here is 162 00:11:24.039 --> 00:11:28.480 a demo, here's what you have to do next, MR and Mrs Customer. 163 00:11:30.080 --> 00:11:33.389 We actually say hey, this is an education process. So we don't 164 00:11:33.389 --> 00:11:37.110 run a traditional sales process. Our focus is really and helping our champions and 165 00:11:37.230 --> 00:11:41.389 influencers develop a strong, wrong internal business case for how we can benefit the 166 00:11:41.509 --> 00:11:46.070 organization and then taking that and helping them package it to go and sell higher 167 00:11:46.110 --> 00:11:50.460 up a power line, if you will. So we support the process with 168 00:11:50.659 --> 00:11:54.700 content and collateral that's really designed from you know, for a variety of different 169 00:11:54.700 --> 00:11:58.259 stakeholders, including the IT teams and the procurement and finance teams. So that's 170 00:11:58.299 --> 00:12:01.809 the second strategy that we use. And then the third one is we really 171 00:12:01.850 --> 00:12:07.889 let our product tell the narrative and we bring our salespeople, oftentimes on site 172 00:12:07.929 --> 00:12:11.370 with our customers and walk them through these various use cases, setting up our 173 00:12:11.409 --> 00:12:15.450 product along the way to show them how we can take them from being a 174 00:12:15.570 --> 00:12:20.919 reactive talent organization and mature them into being a proactive talent organization along the way. 175 00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:24.559 We create their own narrative within our product and that's been really powerful. 176 00:12:24.919 --> 00:12:28.159 That makes sense. And just on that sort of line of question, I 177 00:12:28.240 --> 00:12:31.950 guess, and you mentioned earlier on in the conversation, that there seems to 178 00:12:31.990 --> 00:12:37.110 being around, you know, five billion dollar investment or they've seen the market, 179 00:12:37.149 --> 00:12:39.669 the HR tech markets worth around five billion dollars. I think the approach 180 00:12:39.710 --> 00:12:43.659 to you've just described with regards to your sales process in particular, where it's 181 00:12:43.659 --> 00:12:50.580 very much an education process, where you're you're engaging in multiple different personas and 182 00:12:50.620 --> 00:12:54.059 you have a value to each of those different personas you touch, how would 183 00:12:54.100 --> 00:12:56.980 you in in a noisy market, what could be seen as a complicated market, 184 00:12:58.100 --> 00:13:03.450 where HL professionals must be absolutely inundated with solutions that, I guess, 185 00:13:03.490 --> 00:13:05.970 could be seen to be offering any similar message to a him, to value 186 00:13:07.049 --> 00:13:09.970 to your solution? How do you how do you differentiate such a noisy, 187 00:13:09.009 --> 00:13:13.399 crowded malcular that? I think there's three things and and let me let me 188 00:13:13.399 --> 00:13:16.679 focus on two of them. But the differentiation process is, I think, 189 00:13:18.080 --> 00:13:22.840 especially in this as companies, product driven. So for us, and I 190 00:13:22.919 --> 00:13:26.629 have to speak to this specifically in our industry, which is talent crm and 191 00:13:26.990 --> 00:13:31.710 talent marketing, you know, it's a it's a product that sits on top 192 00:13:31.750 --> 00:13:35.750 of essentially, if you think about a sales funnel, we are the very 193 00:13:35.909 --> 00:13:41.419 top of the funnel, getting our customers more prospects to market to to ultimately 194 00:13:41.539 --> 00:13:46.740 convert them into candidates. So that's the framework that we use. We have 195 00:13:46.899 --> 00:13:54.259 to have a meaningful, unique and differentiated solution to cut through the noise and 196 00:13:54.500 --> 00:14:01.490 that needs to meet the markets needs and really be prescriptive to this proactive process 197 00:14:01.490 --> 00:14:03.450 that we create for people. So instead of using big words, we have 198 00:14:03.529 --> 00:14:07.370 to have an innovative product and that's that's part of winning SASS game. Is, 199 00:14:07.490 --> 00:14:11.279 I think, to fold number one, you have to have an innovative 200 00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:13.840 product that does cut through the noises you just suggest in number two. You 201 00:14:15.000 --> 00:14:20.240 have to operationalize how you distribute that product and out operationalize your competitors, and 202 00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:24.789 that's something that we continue to build at beamery as a good market strategy. 203 00:14:24.950 --> 00:14:30.629 So have a better product and be more operationally sound and than your peers, 204 00:14:30.669 --> 00:14:33.669 and that's a winning solution in any market. It's specifically in a noisy one 205 00:14:33.789 --> 00:14:39.659 like tea technology that makes sense and I think as well that's is it? 206 00:14:39.179 --> 00:14:43.340 What you just described around having a yes, a great product, but the 207 00:14:43.419 --> 00:14:46.940 second piece around being more operationally effective is even more relevant to you as a 208 00:14:48.019 --> 00:14:50.059 business because it's a bit of an interesting background in that, you know, 209 00:14:50.299 --> 00:14:54.210 a US software company coming out of sale of combatty. You're actually a British 210 00:14:54.250 --> 00:14:58.649 company that is gone the other way and actually entered North America. So and 211 00:14:58.850 --> 00:15:01.570 honest, slightly different tactually as as a UK founding business. What would a 212 00:15:03.289 --> 00:15:07.639 challenges that you faced when expanded to North America and have you seen any differences 213 00:15:07.879 --> 00:15:13.120 between the sale process and how you go about selling in North America versus what 214 00:15:13.240 --> 00:15:16.759 you really started as a business in a meal? Yeah, that's IT'S A 215 00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:22.149 it's a great question. And frankly, breaking the US market in our business 216 00:15:22.549 --> 00:15:28.029 wasn't the biggest challenge. We found that large US based employers in our target 217 00:15:28.110 --> 00:15:33.470 market, North American employer for that matter, generally more progressive from a recruiting 218 00:15:33.509 --> 00:15:37.379 standpoint. In as you point out from your own experiences in the in the 219 00:15:37.460 --> 00:15:41.139 bay area, there's a big supply demand problem. So essentially we're selling a 220 00:15:41.259 --> 00:15:46.299 product that people need in a variety of theaters. Because we're addressing, and 221 00:15:46.419 --> 00:15:48.820 this was at the top of the podcast, one of the things that's really 222 00:15:48.860 --> 00:15:54.129 exciting about our space is there there literally is a supply and demand problem. 223 00:15:54.250 --> 00:15:58.409 We're not creating more stem graduates necessarily at the rate that the market needs them. 224 00:15:58.690 --> 00:16:03.570 So breaking into a market and having people being interested in the things that 225 00:16:03.690 --> 00:16:07.720 we're saying wasn't necessarily our issue. I think that the founders of beam re 226 00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:12.039 prior to my joining about six months ago, what they learned was that the 227 00:16:12.200 --> 00:16:18.429 procurement process and sort of the ways of doing businesses, the nuances might be 228 00:16:19.110 --> 00:16:26.549 a bit different than perhaps starting in the UK and Continental Europe for that for 229 00:16:26.629 --> 00:16:29.870 that matter. So are you at? I'll give you an example of I'll 230 00:16:29.909 --> 00:16:33.220 give you actually two examples of this or maybe the differences to the second part 231 00:16:33.220 --> 00:16:37.100 of your question are Amia prospects and customers tend to have a more, I'd 232 00:16:37.100 --> 00:16:42.139 say, formal evaluation process. They're more organized, there's more of a consensus 233 00:16:42.340 --> 00:16:45.940 building, a formality around the consensus building. So, for example, in 234 00:16:47.059 --> 00:16:52.210 that we see more steering committees, more formal RFP's, more request for tenders, 235 00:16:52.809 --> 00:16:56.570 things that are more of this sort of formalized, step based process to 236 00:16:56.610 --> 00:17:00.090 get through procurement. The communications are more formal, the meetings are more formal. 237 00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:07.119 Finance it and procurement are more out in front earlier, in our our 238 00:17:07.240 --> 00:17:12.240 perspective, evaluation processes outside of North America, and I attribute that to there's 239 00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:17.710 a cultural difference. On the flip side, in North America we see more 240 00:17:17.789 --> 00:17:25.630 at hoc processes. We see less executive buying earlier in the early stages of 241 00:17:25.710 --> 00:17:29.589 a project until we get maybe through the middle of the project where we have 242 00:17:29.750 --> 00:17:33.099 to, as I mentioned before, take our folks that are lower on the 243 00:17:33.180 --> 00:17:38.299 power line, our champions and influencers, and build them into people that are 244 00:17:38.420 --> 00:17:45.490 ultimately developing our value proposition, to get experienced or more senior DM's decision makers 245 00:17:45.809 --> 00:17:49.450 involved, so our observation, in short, is that US companies are more 246 00:17:49.490 --> 00:17:53.609 comfortable with buying technology in general, but the processes are looser, they're more 247 00:17:53.690 --> 00:18:00.000 informal. We have to actually put more inertia into the meetings to get into 248 00:18:00.119 --> 00:18:04.200 the decision makers lexicon of decisionmaking, and that's been the biggest sort of eye 249 00:18:04.240 --> 00:18:07.680 opening thing for us. And then there's some little differences and how we communicate 250 00:18:08.119 --> 00:18:12.589 sort of tactical things that you'll see absolutely and I think to your point around 251 00:18:12.589 --> 00:18:15.869 the tactical difference, it's that that just comes down to a coach with Ain, 252 00:18:17.069 --> 00:18:21.630 I mean we see uk us slightly more cynical markets, if you like, 253 00:18:21.829 --> 00:18:25.509 whereas if you go into Spain or front or Italy you must need to 254 00:18:25.549 --> 00:18:30.619 start wanting and dining prospect so it's that can be completely different in side processes 255 00:18:30.779 --> 00:18:33.779 are entertainment budget. You know, when we look at just line item budgets 256 00:18:33.819 --> 00:18:38.299 for travel and entertainment and you look at the region in the world that accumulates 257 00:18:38.700 --> 00:18:42.289 proportionally anyway, the most spend, it's the nordics. I don't know why, 258 00:18:42.650 --> 00:18:47.369 maybe it's cultural, but I've seen it trend for four quarters now. 259 00:18:47.970 --> 00:18:51.009 Is Interesting. I've no I was expecting to say Italy, O, Spain 260 00:18:51.089 --> 00:18:55.759 or something, so that that's very true. So, Joe, the the 261 00:18:55.839 --> 00:18:59.759 insights have been really and intriguing. So I really appreciate that you've taken the 262 00:18:59.839 --> 00:19:02.960 time to share your thoughts with the audience today. Yes, the last point 263 00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:06.440 is, if anyone wants to connect with you to learn more about beamery or 264 00:19:06.480 --> 00:19:08.920 continue this conversation offline, what would be the best way to get in touch 265 00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:12.230 with you and the and the business? Absolutely, I'm easy to find, 266 00:19:12.269 --> 00:19:17.109 so I'm on Linkedin. It's Joel passing, and then my email address is 267 00:19:17.150 --> 00:19:21.109 very simple. It's Joel at BEA MARIECOM and I have to put a plug 268 00:19:21.230 --> 00:19:25.660 in and tell you that we're always looking for a talented sales folks and talented 269 00:19:25.660 --> 00:19:29.859 marketing people, both in the United States and in London. So I appreciate 270 00:19:29.900 --> 00:19:33.500 your time and I appreciate you having me. Thanks a lot once again, 271 00:19:33.539 --> 00:19:36.180 Joe. was great having you on the show. And then we appreciate so 272 00:19:36.539 --> 00:19:44.250 very good. operatics has redefined the meaning of revenue generation for technology companies worldwide. 273 00:19:44.289 --> 00:19:48.970 While the traditional concepts of building and managing inside sales teams inhouse has existed 274 00:19:49.089 --> 00:19:53.400 for many years, companies are struggling with a lack of focus, agility and 275 00:19:53.640 --> 00:20:00.119 scale required in today's fast and complex world of enterprise technology sales. See How 276 00:20:00.160 --> 00:20:07.869 operatics can help your company accelerate pipeline at operatics dotnet. You've been listening to 277 00:20:07.990 --> 00:20:11.869 be tob revenue acceleration. To ensure that you never miss an episode, subscribe 278 00:20:11.869 --> 00:20:15.430 to the show in your favorite podcast player. Thank you so much for listening. 279 00:20:15.470 --> 00:20:17.630 Until next time,

Other Episodes

Episode

December 12, 2019 00:23:04
Episode Cover

66: How a Challenger Sales Strategy Impacts Organizations w/ Bill Bice

Bill started his first company when he was 18. Since then, he’s founded and/or advised 27 different companies. He doesn’t need a marketer to...

Listen

Episode

January 07, 2021 00:25:41
Episode Cover

94: A Playbook for Cloud Enterprise Sales Professionals w/ Paul Melchiorre

What does it take to be successful in Cloud Enterprise Sales? How will the enterprise cloud sales market look like the next 5 to...

Listen

Episode

January 20, 2022 00:32:34
Episode Cover

119: How to Build a Personal Brand w/ Daniel Disney

It’s no longer enough to have a great product. Today, people are only going to buy from you if they feel like you care...

Listen